The plaintiff alleged that the defendant's "dog" -- mixed-breed, pit mix with a severed ear that patrolled an automobile yard -- was aggressive with the other canines. The defendant countered that his dog was "playing" and "barking" -- and that the plaintiff was oversensitive. Physical contact ensues, and the plaintiff files for damages in television court.
What an unusual scenario. Can't happen in the Rainier Valley.
For those fortunate enough to have jobs during the Bush Recession, work during the day and don't indulge in reality daytime television, here's a three-part loop of the trial:
No comments:
Post a Comment